Abs’ Labs
Agent 7 · London Market Intelligence · July 2026
→ to begin
Agent 7·An early look

The research an entire desk does by hand — in a single question.

I’m Abhishek Suroiwal.

23
Years writing code
First line at 11.
$100K
Scholarship at 25
→ MSc Artificial Intelligence, QMUL.
Partner
Treaty Reinsurance
McGill and Partners.
1 month
To build Agent 7, solo
It’s live.

No ask today — I’d genuinely value your read. Let me show you.

Abs’ Labs Exploratory conversation · July 2026 · 01 / 05
02 / 05
02·Why now

A record market — and the squeeze has already started.

The pain
30%

of an underwriter’s time is spent on actual underwriting. The other 70% — 40% admin, 30% negotiation and sales support — disappears into assembling information across sources that don’t talk to each other. In a market that just wrote a record £57.9bn with £10.6bn profit.

▼ Rates — falling
7 quarters of decline.

UK commercial −8% (Q1 2026) · property-cat reinsurance −14.7% at 1.1.26 — the steepest since 2014.

▬ Costs — not following
35.6% expense ratio.

Up from three flat years at 34.4% — acquisition costs (~22.6pts) structurally hard to cut.

Lloyd’s own 2026 forecast: 90–95% combined ratio, from 87.6%. Margins squeezed from both ends — efficiency stops being optional.
The window — the centre pulled back

On the day it announced record results, Lloyd’s sunset Blueprint Two — the market’s big-bang digitisation.

“The project has not yielded the benefits that were originally envisioned.”
— Patrick Tiernan, CEO, Lloyd’s · 19 Mar 2026
The edges are moving
95.2%

of global insurtech funding went to AI companies in Q1 2026 ($1.55B of $1.63B). Nobody yet owns London-market intelligence.

The tool that delivers value at the desk, today, wins. That’s what I built.
Lloyd’s FY2025 results · Accenture P&C Underwriting Survey · Marsh Global Index Q1 2026
Howden Re 1.1.26 · Gallagher Re Q1 2026 · Insurance Times, Mar 2026
03 / 05
03·What Agent 7 is — live

A London-market analyst that shows its working.

Ask it what you’d ask your sharpest analyst — a peril, a syndicate, a treaty structure, a market cycle, in plain English. A considered, referenced answer in seconds, not a research afternoon.

Every claim is sourced, and it goes quiet when the record won’t back one. The failure mode is “the evidence isn’t there” — never a confident guess. That is the line between this and a general-purpose model.

2,586
Primary sources
~29,500
Market entities, one graph

Mapping not just what was written, but how events, perils and responses connect — it can trace why a market moved, not only what changed.

agent7.abslabs.app · London Market Intelligence Live
Query
“Why did catastrophe risk drive the rise of ILS?”
Next, live

Watch it walk the causal chain, every step sourced — then it’s your keyboard.

It makes the case better than I can. Give it your hardest question.
04 / 05
04·What’s out there

Everyone’s near the seat. Nobody’s in it.

News & data
tells you what happened
Insurance Insider · S&P Global · AM Best · Bloomberg

Trusted, embedded — but articles and tables: no reasoning, no “who has appetite for this risk?”

The plumbing
executes the transaction
PPL · Whitespace · Sequel

Near-universal adoption — 21 of 31 Lloyd’s brokers on Whitespace — and by design they digitise process, not insight.

Workflow & pricing AI
processes the risk
hx ($100M+ raised) · Cytora→Applied · Artificial Labs ($45M) · Send · FurtherAI

Well-funded proof of demand — but they automate intake, pricing and placement mechanics. “What should I price this at?” — not “where should I place it, and why?”

General AI
reasons, ungrounded
ChatGPT · Claude · in-house copilots

Already on desks — but on syndicate-level facts they guess, uncited. A confident wrong answer is worse than no answer.

London-market grounding + AI reasoning + verifiable citations — the intelligence seat is empty.
Do you see the same gap?
05 / 05
05·No ask — your read

What I came to hear.

01
Does this match the pain you actually see on the desks?
02
Where would it be most valuable first — which workflow or team?
03
What would make a tool like this credible and adoptable in a shop like yours?
04
What’s the risk or objection you’d raise before anyone else does?
Abs’ Labs Exploratory conversation · July 2026 · 05 / 05